State v. Ramos

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed Ramos’ convictions and sentences, rejecting challenges based on constitutional speedy trial and due process, jury selection, discovery violations, the denial of a new trial, lay identification testimony, witness transport, and residual hearsay. The court held that most delay was attributable to Ramos’ own motions and appeals, the undisclosed evidence was not material or prejudicial, the prosecutor’s juror strike was race neutral and genuine, and the challenged evidence rulings were within the district court’s discretion.