State v. Gleaton

Summary

The court affirmed Gleaton’s convictions and sentences, except that it modified the sentencing credit because credit for time served cannot be applied to a life sentence. It held that the district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting expert testimony based on cell phone round-trip-time data, overruling objections to the prosecutor’s closing arguments, declining to strike victim-impact material from the presentence report, or permitting the sentencing judge’s questions. The court also concluded that the sentencing-credit error was plain error and ordered the credit applied to the consecutive nonlife sentences.