State v. Boeggeman

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Boeggeman's postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing because it was filed outside the one-year statutory limitation period. The court held that the limitation period is not subject to equitable tolling, even when the prisoner was in another jurisdiction's custody during the relevant period, and concluded that his supplemental allegations concerned postjudgment events that could not support postconviction relief. The court also addressed bypass petitions, stating that parties should identify the statutory factors supporting bypass.