Nebraska Supreme Court

State v. Applehans

July 7, 2023314 Neb. 653

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s judgment, holding that the alleged failure to advise the defendant of post‑release supervision conditions did not constitute plain error, the sentences were not excessive, the bond issue was moot, and the ineffective‑assistance claim was procedurally barred. The court based its decision on the plain‑error standard, the abuse‑of‑discretion standard for sentencing, and the requirement that ineffective‑assistance assignments allege deficient performance.