BCL Properties v. Boyle

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s judgment except for vacating the award of attorney fees. It held that the exclusion of proposed exhibits was not a final ruling on admissibility, that the court did not err by accepting the jury verdict without answering the jury’s written question, and that prejudgment interest was proper while attorney fees were not authorized under § 52‑157. The court applied de novo review to the prejudgment interest award and abuse‑of‑discretion review to the other issues.