Edward G. Hajenga, Appellee v. Chin G. Hajenga, Appellant

Summary

The court held that the dissolution decree improperly deviated from the child support guidelines without stating the basis for deviation, calculating the guideline amount, or providing required reductions as each child became ineligible for support. It upheld the inclusion of Edward's obligation to repay money borrowed from his mother as a marital debt but found plain error in delegating control over visitation to a family therapist. The decree was affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part.