Netzer v. State

Summary

The court held that the district court ultimately complied with the remand instructions because its supplemental order cured the initial procedural error of treating the preliminary-injunction ruling as preclusive of the merits. It affirmed dismissal of the constitutional claims and upheld the provision prohibiting discrimination based on vaccination status, but reversed the ruling invalidating the provision barring vaccine requirements for emergency-use or safety-trial vaccines. The court applied a liberal, objective clear-title analysis and concluded that both provisions were germane to the bill's broad vaccination-status subject.