Melissa Moody v. Dynamic Fitness Management, LTD.

Summary

The Court affirmed the judgment for Moody because Dynamic failed to preserve its challenges to the directed-verdict rulings and the admission of spoliation-related adverse-inference evidence. The Court also held that Moody’s verdict-directing instruction did not give the jury a roving commission because it properly submitted alternative negligent acts, required a finding of direct causation, and was supported by sufficient evidence.