Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation v. Kelly Donaldson and Robert Haulcy, and Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation v…

Summary

The court held that the consumers' arbitration agreements were valid, supported by consideration, conscionable, and not barred by collateral estoppel. Because the installment contracts and arbitration agreements formed one integrated contract, consideration for the vehicle-financing transactions also supported the arbitration provisions. The court reversed the orders denying Bridgecrest's motions to compel arbitration and remanded for further proceedings.