Charles H. Moton v. City of Clarksdale, Mississippi, Hon. Robert M. Tyner as the of the Estate of William O…

Summary

The Mississippi Supreme Court denied rehearing, withdrew its prior opinion, substituted this opinion, and affirmed dismissal of Moton's claims. It held that his common-law tort claims were subject to the Mississippi Tort Claims Act's one-year limitations period and presuit-notice requirements, his constitutional claims were subject to the general three-year limitations period, and his malicious-prosecution claim was subject to a one-year limitations period. All claims were untimely.