Keith Hapana Crow v. State of Minnesota

Summary

The court affirmed the summary denial of Crow's fourth postconviction petition. It held that Crow, who was an adult when the murder occurred, was not entitled to resentencing based on his juvenile codefendant's sentence, and that his remaining claims were either procedurally barred, unsupported, or lacked substantive merit. The court also concluded that Crow's alleged mental disease did not require disregarding the statutory filing period because the State did not rely on that bar and the claims were rejected on other grounds.