Melvin Bilbro v. State of Minnesota

Summary

The Supreme Court of Minnesota reversed the court of appeals' determination that Bilbro's consecutive sentences were authorized and remanded for imposition of concurrent sentences. The court also granted Bilbro's motion to strike the portion of the State's brief arguing that his sentencing motion was properly treated as a postconviction petition. The court did not review the court of appeals' ruling concerning the conditional-release term.