Robinson v. Marshfield

Summary

The court affirmed a jury verdict finding that Marshfield retaliated against Robinson for opposing perceived gender discrimination against his niece. It held that the evidence supported liability and that, although the jury instructions improperly blended pretext and mixed-motive frameworks, the error was not prejudicial because the instructions and special verdict findings established causation and intentional, extreme, and outrageous conduct. The court also upheld the compensatory and punitive damages awards.