Prince George's Cty. v. Concerned Citizens

Summary

The court held that the County Council’s zoning text amendment was a legislative action subject to limited judicial review for legality, not a site-specific quasi-judicial rezoning requiring different procedures. It further held that the amendment did not violate the statutory uniformity requirement because it served valid public purposes and did not unreasonably discriminate between similarly situated properties. The court therefore reversed the intermediate appellate court and affirmed the Council’s decision.