State of Maine v. Kenneth Rhoades

Summary

The court affirmed Rhoades's OUI conviction, holding that the officer had reasonable articulable suspicion to stop his vehicle based on a trained visual estimate that Rhoades was driving substantially over the speed limit. It also upheld admission of the Intoxilyzer result, concluding that the State sufficiently established reliability and that machine-generated breath-test data did not implicate the Confrontation Clause. The court further held that the late disclosure of impeachment information did not warrant a discovery sanction because Rhoades showed no prejudice. There are no separate opinions.