State of Maine v. Calixte Fleury

Summary

The court upheld Fleury’s convictions, concluding that applying the former statutory definition of trafficking to his 2020 conduct was constitutional and that the later, more lenient amendment did not apply retroactively. The court nevertheless vacated the sentence because the aggravated-trafficking, trafficking, and possession counts were duplicative and had to be merged for sentencing to avoid a double-jeopardy violation.