Sotoy A. Minter v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Summary

The court affirmed Minter’s convictions for first-degree sodomy and first-degree burglary and his persistent-felony-offender enhancement. It held that the evidence, viewed in the Commonwealth’s favor, supported an inference that Minter entered the apartment unlawfully with intent to commit a crime; that evidence of the victim’s prior sexual conduct was barred by the rape-shield rule; and that the delayed PFO charge caused no identified prejudice. No separate opinions were filed.