State v. J.L.J.

Summary

The court affirmed J.L.J.'s convictions and sentence after finding one prosecutorial error during voir dire but concluding it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The court rejected the remaining prosecutorial-error claims, held that impeachment about J.L.J.'s review of discovery did not violate the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine, and declined to apply cumulative-error review. It also refused to reach J.L.J.'s unpreserved challenge to the adult-certification process because he did not establish a reason to depart from existing precedent.