State v. Harris

Summary

The Kansas Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s denial of Harris’s post‑conviction DNA‑testing and spoliation claims, holding that K.S.A. 21‑2512 neither obligates a court to order testing the defendant does not request nor imposes a duty on the State to retain non‑biological evidence, and that Harris’s due‑process claim is barred by the one‑year limitation in K.S.A. 60‑1507.