State v. Breitenbach

Summary

The court affirmed Breitenbach's convictions for attempted capital murder, aggravated criminal sodomy, and aggravated burglary. It held that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying public funding for additional DNA testing, refusing to appoint substitute or standby counsel, or denying a new trial based on delayed fingerprint disclosure. The court also concluded that no cumulative error existed because it found no individual errors.