Steven Norris v. Jennifer Norris

Summary

The court affirmed the trial court’s original order declining to award damages for credit-related losses arising from Jennifer Norris’s contempt. It held that the damages evidence was too speculative to establish causation or amount and that the trial court did not clearly err in rejecting it. The court also held that the trial court’s revised order, issued while the appeal was pending and before certification of the appellate opinion, was void for lack of jurisdiction.