In the Matter of Theodore Edward Rokita

Summary

The Indiana Supreme Court approved a conditional agreement finding that Theodore Rokita violated Professional Conduct Rules 3.6(a) and 4.4(a) by making a nationally televised statement about an investigated physician that could materially prejudice proceedings and had no substantial purpose other than to embarrass or burden the physician. Balancing the misconduct, its reach, aggravating and mitigating factors, and comparable discipline, the Court imposed a public reprimand and costs. Chief Justice Rush and Justice Goff dissented from approving the agreement because they considered the discipline too lenient given Rokita's position and the scope of the misconduct.