Kristopher L. Weida, Appellant (defendant Below) v. State of Indiana, Appellee (plaintiff Below)

Summary

The court held that the probation condition barring access to websites frequented by children was sufficiently clear, reasonably related to rehabilitation and public safety, and not unduly intrusive on Weida's free-speech rights. It held that the broader condition requiring prior approval for all internet access was unreasonable as applied because it was not sufficiently connected to Weida's offense or rehabilitative needs. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for a narrower internet restriction.