People v. Conway

Summary

The court held that the evidence was sufficient to prove Conway guilty of being an armed habitual criminal because the eyewitness identification and circumstantial evidence supported a finding that he possessed the firearm. It also held that the trial court's comments about the police officer's training and attention reflected a credibility determination rather than impermissible judicial bias. The court affirmed the sufficiency ruling, reversed the new-trial ruling, and remanded for consideration of Conway's remaining claims.