Jones v. Sligar

Summary

The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed both judgments arising from the dissolution of the parties’ business venture. It held that the small-claims actions were properly consolidated, Jones’s Rule 60(b) motion was untimely because it was not filed within a reasonable time, and claim preclusion barred his later accounting action. The Court also affirmed the attorney-fee rulings, awarding fees to Sligar for the Sligar I appeal but awarding no appellate fees in Sligar II.