Tabb v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Tabb’s convictions for malice murder and related offenses. It held that the evidence, including Tabb’s admissions and corroborating circumstances, was sufficient; that his visible-shackling claim was not preserved; and that none of his ineffective-assistance claims established deficient performance. The court also rejected cumulative-prejudice relief because it found no individual trial error or deficient performance.