Shoffner v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Shoffner’s convictions and sentences, concluding that the trial evidence was constitutionally sufficient, his custodial statement was voluntary and obtained after a valid waiver of rights, and his mistrial claim was not preserved. The court also rejected his ineffective-assistance claims because he did not show objectively deficient performance, particularly given counsel’s preparation and the on-the-record advice concerning his right to testify.