Rainey v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Rainey's convictions, holding that the evidence was constitutionally sufficient to show that she was a party to entering the victim's separately rented bedroom without authority. It also held that the trial court did not plainly err by admitting voice-identification testimony supported by witnesses' prior familiarity with Rainey's voice, or by failing to give an unrequested conspiracy instruction. No separate opinions were filed.