Woschula v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Woschula’s convictions for malice murder and related offenses. It held that the requested voluntary-intoxication instruction was legally incorrect because it omitted the requirement of permanent brain-function alteration, that any assumed error in admitting prior-acts evidence was harmless, and that admission of Woschula’s post-arrest statements did not violate due process because he identified no coercive police conduct. All Justices concurred.