Jones v. State

Summary

The court affirmed the denial of Jones’s motion to suppress evidence obtained through two geofence warrants. It held that the warrants were supported by probable cause because the affidavits established a fair probability that location data would help identify the murder suspect, and that the warrants were sufficiently particular because they limited the information sought by place, time, device, and investigative purpose. The court also held that Jones could not challenge the alleged search of other users’ data and that the police did not rely on any potentially overbroad provision to obtain her identifying information.