Holloway v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed Holloway’s convictions, holding that the evidence was sufficient to establish his responsibility for felony murder even though he was not at the scene and did not intend for the victim to be shot. The Court also rejected his unpreserved challenges to conspiracy, proximate-cause, and witness-impeachment instructions under plain-error review, concluding that the instructions and evidence did not establish reversible prejudice. Finally, the Court held that evidence of the group’s trip to Alabama to seek another robbery was intrinsic to the charged crimes and properly admitted.