Dillard v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Dillard’s convictions for malice murder and related offenses, holding that the trial evidence was sufficient under both constitutional due-process standards and Georgia law. The evidence included the surviving victim’s identification and testimony, Dillard’s admissions, corroborating physical and cellular evidence, and evidence that Dillard committed the robbery and shooting. The court also held that the surviving victim was not Dillard’s accomplice in the charged crimes, so his testimony did not require corroboration.