Denny v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Denny’s convictions, holding that he failed to establish ineffective assistance based on counsel’s decisions concerning evidence from his Jeep, the door, and the gunshot-residue report. The proposed objection to the Jeep evidence would have been meritless, counsel’s decision regarding the door was strategically reasonable, and Denny failed to show prejudice from not admitting the residue report.