Williams, Congresswoman v. Powell

Summary

The court affirmed dismissal of the appellants’ facial challenges to the statute regulating conduct at the State Capitol and locations connected with General Assembly business. It held that the challenged provisions were not facially overbroad or vague because their regulated settings and conduct gave the statute a sufficiently narrow legitimate scope and provided adequate notice. The court also affirmed dismissal of one appellant’s as-applied claim because the alleged conduct did not fall within the statute’s prohibitions.