Vendrel v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Vendrel’s convictions, holding that he was not constructively denied counsel and that he failed to prove ineffective assistance under the ordinary two-part standard. The court rejected his claims concerning preparation of defense witnesses, preparation for his own testimony, and failure to consult or call forensic experts because he did not establish deficient performance or prejudice. It also rejected his cumulative-prejudice claim. No separate opinions were filed.