Sharkey v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Sharkey’s convictions for malice murder and armed robbery, holding that the evidence was constitutionally sufficient to establish his identity, intent, malice, and commission of the robbery. It further held that any error in excluding a video of a child identifying another person, and any deficient performance by counsel in failing to admit that video, was harmless or nonprejudicial because the evidence of guilt was strong. There are no separate opinions.