Nabors v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed Nabors's murder convictions, holding that his trial counsel’s advice not to testify was not constitutionally deficient and that the State’s evidence, including corroborated accomplice testimony, satisfied the corroboration requirement of OCGA § 24‑14‑8. The Court rejected both the ineffective‑assistance claim and the argument that the verdict rested solely on accomplice testimony.