Session v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Session’s convictions for failing to register as a sex offender. It held that Session failed to demonstrate evidentiary insufficiency because he conceded the only developed sufficiency argument, and his newly advanced argument was not preserved. The court also rejected his federal right-to-travel and equal-protection challenges as resting on speculation about how Georgia would have prosecuted the underlying conduct, and rejected his facial challenge under the Georgia Constitution’s Social Status Provision. There were no separate opinions.