Saylor v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Saylor’s convictions, holding that sufficient evidence supported his convictions for aggravated assault and criminal damage as a party to crimes committed in furtherance of a common criminal enterprise. It also held that the trial court did not err in denying severance, that any error in excusing prospective jurors was harmless because a competent and unbiased jury was selected, and that the Street Gang Act conviction did not require vacatur because the jury identified valid predicate offenses. No separate opinions were filed.