Supreme Court of Georgia
Nundra v. State
March 21, 2023316 Ga. 1
Summary
The court affirmed Nundra’s convictions, concluding that two assumed evidentiary errors were harmless individually and cumulatively, the State’s inflammatory closing comparisons were permissible argument, and the challenge to TrueAllele DNA evidence was unpreserved and did not satisfy plain-error review. The court relied principally on the strength of the properly admitted evidence, limiting and anti-sympathy instructions, and Nundra’s failure to show a clear or obvious error affecting the outcome.