Meadows v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed Meadows's convictions for malice murder and possession of a firearm, holding the evidence was sufficient, that the Court lacks authority to act as a “thirteenth juror,” that failure to rebuke the prosecutor was harmless, and that Meadows failed to preserve two of the objections. The Court vacated the aggravated‑assault sentence that merged with the murder conviction and remanded for resentencing.