In the Matter of David Roberson

Summary

The Court affirmed the Board’s denial of David Roberson’s application for certification of fitness to practice law. It held that Roberson failed to prove rehabilitation by clear and convincing evidence because he did not demonstrate sufficient candor, responsibility, insight, or appreciation of the harm caused by his misconduct, and it further held that he had not satisfied the reinstatement condition requiring full restitution. The Court also concluded that the Board did not clearly err in denying certification.