Head v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Head’s convictions, holding that the accomplice testimony was sufficiently corroborated by independent evidence, including witness statements, phone-related evidence, Head’s statements, and the recovery of a gun matching the accomplice’s description. The court further held that any error in admitting the detective’s hearsay testimony about Head’s use of a phone number was harmless because the evidence was cumulative and independent admissible evidence supported the verdict.