Winslow v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Winslow’s convictions, holding that the evidence from his laptop was admissible because his consent reasonably encompassed a later forensic search and had not been withdrawn. It rejected his facial cruel-and-unusual-punishment challenge to the statutory sentencing scheme, but vacated the sentences because all counts arose from simultaneous possession of two videos and should have been merged for sentencing. The court therefore remanded for resentencing and did not reach the as-applied sentencing challenge.