Winslow v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Winslow's convictions, holding that his consent to search his bag and its contents reasonably extended to a later forensic search of his laptop and was not shown to have been withdrawn. It rejected his facial challenge to the statutory sentencing range as not grossly disproportionate under the constitutional prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment, while declining to reach his as-applied challenge because the sentence was vacated. The court vacated the sentences and remanded because the trial court was required to merge all counts based on Winslow's simultaneous possession of the two videos and sentence him on only one count.