Reed v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Reed’s convictions except for the felony-murder conviction and held that he must be resentenced because he could not receive sentences for both malice murder and felony murder arising from one death. It rejected his challenges concerning evidentiary sufficiency, appellate delay, unrecorded bench conferences, prosecutorial disqualification, the incomplete transcript, allegedly suppressed Crime Stoppers information, the denied continuance, and ineffective assistance of counsel. All Justices concurred.