In the Matter of Daniel Kirkland McCall

Summary

The Court rejected McCall’s petition for voluntary discipline despite his admitted violations and the parties’ proposed six-month suspension. The Court found that the proposed reinstatement conditions were inadequate because the Court could not add more stringent conditions to the petition, and McCall had not sufficiently shown that his suspension should be imposed nunc pro tunc. The Court also identified concerns regarding his failure to refund fees, the harm to a client, and conflicting evidence about his fitness to practice law.