In the Interest of C.c., Children

Summary

The Court held that the appeal was not moot because the agency’s unilateral policy change was revocable, did not disclaim the legality of its prior conduct, and failed to prevent a vaccination from occurring. The Court vacated and remanded because the juvenile court evaluated the parents’ religious sincerity under an incorrect legal standard, while declining to reach the constitutional and statutory merits. The Court directed the juvenile court to determine whether the parents’ objection was genuinely religiously motivated before addressing the remaining claims.