Neuman v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Neuman’s convictions for malice murder and firearm possession after his second trial. It held that his collateral-estoppel claim was unpreserved, found no abuse of discretion in denying disqualification of the district attorney’s office or in managing defense-witness testimony, and concluded that any assumed evidentiary errors were harmless. The ineffective-assistance claim failed because Neuman did not establish prejudice.