Dunn v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Dunn's convictions, holding that sufficient evidence supported the required connection between his gang-related crimes and an intent to further gang interests. The court declined to review some evidentiary arguments because they were not preserved or were directed at a basis different from the one relied on by the trial court, and it held that any assumed errors in admitting probation materials and a gang-related video did not affect the verdict. The court also rejected Dunn's ineffective-assistance claim for lack of prejudice.